unity-design team mailing list archive

[Matthew Paul Thomas <mpt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Hamm wrote on 25/06/10 17:32:
> 
> "I don't see how CSD would improve that situation at all"
> 
> From what I've read csd would be more elegant at both a programing level
> and design level, with less resources and the ability to design
> applications for what they are, rather then having the witch of the west
> hang over all apps. The long standing annoyance of getting the app to
> blend with metacity would also be self correcting. 
> 
> Of course the minor annoyance at hand could be solved by a number of
> things but why tell the scarecrow he's and idiot when you can travel to
> Emerald city and save us all.

Sorry, I still have no idea how that relates to progress windows.

The progress window when unmounting a device, for example, correctly has
no close button. It doesn't need CSD to achieve that.

- -- 
Matthew Paul Thomas
http://mpt.net.nz/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwocZ4ACgkQ6PUxNfU6ecp2FACfVHlEpJSirlB0tsNv4yIjWPB+
qq4AoKou8PeZ/QXaYOytWTbIbEr3S4Tz
=x7Fo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----