unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09612
Re: Desktop as a widget space.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/29/2012 03:30 AM, Sunil Singh Rana wrote:
>
> *Why not be make Desktop a widget space.* Widgets that are locked or
>>
>> unlocked (to manage them) by some key combination, or a dedicated mouse
>> gesture. We could also put a lens on Dash called Desktop which would
>> look like a desktop and will allow us to manage all our widgets.
>>
>
> How about asking "why?" before asking "why not?"
>
I agree. I guess for the same reason we display some information under the
glass sheet, as I mentioned earlier. It gives a sneak peek into the updated
information, without having to move my mouse and click somewhere.
*Does it appeal to the user? I think it is not very hard to find some data
from Google Play to check the number of installs of 'beautiful widgets' (
100,000 < installs < 500,000). Beautiful widgets are free to download. If
we go for HD widgets which costs some 2 dollar per install has the number
of installs in the same range. Data shows that widgets do appeal to the
user.*
In android widgets have been a huge success. In fact, widgets have given
android a lot of advantage against Iphone. I keep reading, widgets as often
requested feature by Iphone Users, in the upcoming version of iOS.
But anyway, regarding why not:
> - Users have to become aware of the widget functionality somehow
> (otherwise there can be no benefit, only cost)
> - It adds a potentially hard to understand distinction between windows of
> normal applications and widgets. After figuring out how to manage windows,
> users are expected to also figure out how to manage widgets?
> - Cost of yet another key combo and/or gesture
> - Widgets will need some visibility and stacking behavior that has to be
> specified, implemented, tested and documented. The desktop as it is now,
> with just the addition of widgets. would mean that any application window
> would always be above any widget ...
>
I get your point and agree that it poses risks.
>
> A lot of cost and risk. What are the potential benefits, the opportunity?
>
If I could, I would have the Google Plus, Agenda, Mail, Facebook, twitter,
weather widgets on my desktop. Together, it has the potential to save
several clicks.
>
> What job is there for a "widget", that can't be fulfilled with an
> indicator or a small application (perhaps with a custom window appearance)?
Well, I roughly answered that. :)
I wouldn't like to go to KDE for the widgets only.
>
>
>
> --
> Thorsten Wilms
>
> thorwil's design for free software:
> http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-**design<https://launchpad.net/~unity-design>
> Post to : unity-design@lists.launchpad.**net<unity-design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-**design<https://launchpad.net/~unity-design>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>
--
सुनील राणा
"Unselfishness is more paying only people have not the patience to practice
it."
" 'I love you' is a wrong sentence as where, there exist 'I' and 'you' love
can not. Love is an attribute of the absolute."
Follow ups
References