wintermute-devel team mailing list archive

[SII <dante.ashton@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We'd still have to do some major mods to get Winty to fit it into it's own
DE. (yes, working on the design, give me a couple more days)

-Dante

On 6 September 2011 20:18, Jacky Alcine <jacky.alcine@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Wouldn't have to totally modify Chromium, we'd have to take advantage of
> NPAPI (ie: search up Chromify-OSD in the Chrome Store). We could bind it to
> interpret whatever it can from Flash objects (some objects could be linked
> to RDF data, but I haven't seen it done).
>
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:34 AM, SII <dante.ashton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> OK, all of you know we're working on a 'closed' environment to make things
>> simpler for Wintermute; This means control of functions/applications as well
>> as versions.
>> The trouble is, how do we deal with the web?
>>
>> I'm not a web dev; so I'm not sure about a lot of things when it comes to
>> web-browsing for a machine. For instance, Flash objects will be opaque to
>> Wintermute; it only makes sense to humans. Same with video regardless of
>> format.
>>
>> Perhaps a modified version of Chromium?
>>
>> Thoughts/problems/etc?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jacky Alcine
> Blog <http://jackyalcine.co.cc/> | Launchpad<https://launchpad.net/~jackyalcine>
>
>