yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Václav Šmilauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>]

> > (Another dicussion would be if the classes should still be renamed,
> > I don't think the proposal is good. But that's for later.)
> 
> it's in the highly-ranked journals already. Too late :P

Lame argument.

I don't want to get into that because I think yade has been stagnating
functionality-wise for quite long, while piling up bunch of duplicated
low-quality code without any documentation; debating class names is
really secondary for me, as much as it is boring.

If you want to conserve yade as you described it in your papers few
years back, go ahead, but don't count on me (not speaking of others,
though).

V.