yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03841
Re: naming consistency of viscoelastic classes
-
To:
yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"Sergei D." <sj2001@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:53:34 +0400
-
In-reply-to:
<1270464105.2786.31.camel@flux>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ru; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100228 SUSE/3.0.3-3.1 Thunderbird/3.0.3
> Hi all, I was browsing classes for viscoelasticity, and their names are
> very long and not entirely consistent (with
> https://www.yade-dem.org/sphinx/yade.wrapper.html#constitutive-laws, for
> instance)... I would suggest to rename them approximately like this
>
> SimpleViscoelasticMat -> ViscelMat (or ViscElMat?)
> SimpleViscoelasticPhys -> ViscelPhys
> Ip2_SimleViscoelasticMat_SimpleViscoelasticMat_SimpleViscoelasticPhys -> Ip2_2xViscelMat_ViscelPhys (or Ip2_ViscelMat_ViscelMat_ViscelPhys)
> Law2_Spheres_Viscoelastic_SimpleViscoelastic -> Law2_ScGeom_ViscelPhys_Basic
>
> Doing so using scripts/class-rename.py, we will keep backwards
> compatibility with python scripts (and yade --update will update them).
>
> Should I go ahead?
>
I have no objection...
But I have some doubt about ViscelMat name. I think it is _very_ short,
so it lost its meaning... I more like VisoelastMat for example..
--
Best regards,
Sergei D.
References