yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06913
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
For next commit :
1/ refH vs. trsf : do you agree that it is better to make them independant?
2/ refH can be kept in Cell if you prefer.
3/ I'll remove H0.
4/ I'll add size back.
5/ I'll revert the comment for size: size is not normalStrain x refSize
(refSize is not a member, size is not 0 if strain is 0, even (1+strain)x
refSize would not work in large strain).
6/ I'll rename setBox->setAxisAlignedBox, or setAABox, unless you think
it is not necessary.
Bruno
p.s. I didn't want to offense. I'm only trying to gain experience from
what happened (last mail is the result of in-between thinking). If you
know what I could change on my part to interact better, please tell me,
because getting commits reverted makes work cycles awkward. I'll
consider any solution to avoid that (forking excepted ;-) ). Should I
explain more before commits in your opinion?
On 01/02/11 13:45, Václav Šmilauer wrote:
> Come on, dude... Did something change between in since midnight, such
> that your last 2 replies are so different? The first one was nice, but
> I have no intention to reply to your flames in the latter. I am glad
> that we more or less agreed about Cell, no need to spoil it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
--
_______________
Bruno Chareyre
Associate Professor
ENSE³ - Grenoble INP
Lab. 3SR
BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France
Tél : +33 4 56 52 86 21
Fax : +33 4 76 82 70 43
________________
Follow ups
References