yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13153
Meaning/Doc of ViscoFrictPhys in connection with Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity
-
To:
Yade dev <yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Jerome Duriez <Jerome.Duriez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 27 Jun 2017 22:13:01 +0000
-
Accept-language:
en-CA, en-US
-
Authentication-results:
lists.launchpad.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;lists.launchpad.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ucalgary.ca;
-
Spamdiagnosticmetadata:
NSPM
-
Spamdiagnosticoutput:
1:99
-
Thread-index:
AQHS75ICn/bFN7ZkJECES65BEn3/VA==
-
Thread-topic:
Meaning/Doc of ViscoFrictPhys in connection with Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity
Hi,
As said elsewhere, I'm removing Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity from trunk. The latter is mentionned in the doc of ViscoFrictPhys [*], with a formulation that even suggests that ViscoFrictPhys was necessary because of Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity.
However, I could not find in the code or in the archive any explanation how these two classes would be related..
Is there actually anything to take care of in ViscoFrictPhys when removing Law2_*_NormalInelasticity (outside removing the mention to Law2_*_NormalInelasticity in the docstring) ?
Jerome
[*] https://yade-dem.org/doc/yade.wrapper.html#yade.wrapper.ViscoFrictPhys
--------------------------------------------------
Jerome Duriez, Research Associate
University of Calgary, Dpt of Civil Engineering
+1 403 220 7367
Follow ups
