yade-dev team mailing list archive

[Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I would also call the comment in ViscoFrictPhys "irrelevant", no problem 
to remove it.
Bruno

On 06/28/2017 12:13 AM, Jerome Duriez wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As said elsewhere, I'm removing 
> Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity from trunk. 
> The latter is mentionned in the doc of ViscoFrictPhys [*], with a 
> formulation that even suggests that ViscoFrictPhys was necessary 
> because of Law2_ScGeom6D_NormalInelasticityPhys_NormalInelasticity.
>
> However, I could not find in the code or in the archive any 
> explanation how these two classes would be related..
>
>
> Is there actually anything to take care of in ViscoFrictPhys when 
> removing Law2_*_NormalInelasticity (outside removing the mention to 
> Law2_*_NormalInelasticity in the docstring) ?
>
>
> Jerome
>
>
> [*] https://yade-dem.org/doc/yade.wrapper.html#yade.wrapper.ViscoFrictPhys
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Jerome Duriez, Research Associate
>
> University of Calgary, Dpt of Civil Engineering
>
> +1 403 220 7367
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> Post to     : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp