yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00559
Compilation Problem
Hi all,
I'm trying to compile YADE-all-0.10.0 on an Ubuntu 6.10 machine. I
understand it won't compile with g++ 4.1, but when I remove 4.1 with
Synaptec, it also removes g++. I've tried installin g++ 3.4 and 4.0, but
they don't install g++ and the compilation fails with a g++: Command not
found error. Installing g++, also re-installs g++ 4.1 and I'm back to
square one. Is there a workaround for this?
Thanks
Frank Miller
Western Transportation Institute
Montana State University
frank.miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: yade-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:yade-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
yade-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:00 AM
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Yade-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 13
Send Yade-users mailing list submissions to
yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
yade-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
yade-users-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Yade-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: new name considerations (Janek Kozicki)
2. Re: new name - voting (updated list). (V?clav ?milauer)
3. voting - last chance :) (Janek Kozicki)
4. new name considerations (Janek Kozicki)
5. my votes :) (Janek Kozicki)
6. new name vote (Lionel Favier)
7. Re: voting (Shiu Wenjie)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:05:04 +0200
From: Janek Kozicki <cosurgi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Yade-users] new name considerations
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20070424120504.2db6fd16@absurd>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Well, looks like nobody wants to vote. So perhaps it was a wrong idea
after all. But anyway, let's finish this. The only voices I get is to
use the name OpenDEM, prefixed with YADE to make the transition more
smooth.
I agree that YADE-*** prefix is a very good way to make the transition
more smooth. So I add this as a voting option. And maybe, if at last
some people will vote, we will use the winning name in place of ***. So
the new name we will be YADE-***
Frederic and Ahmed suggested names for particular packages, like:
> BVPPlatform | DEM
> BVPPlatform | FEM
> YADE-openDEM
> YADE-openFEM
> YADE-openBEAM
as you can see, the problem is that yade is not only for DEM, it can
handle more than just DEM. That's why I think that name OpenDEM will be
a bit misleading. Perhaps the idea from Stefan: "OpenDEM Plus"
would be less misleading.... I'll add this as another voting options.
So I am going to post an update list of names to vote. And that is going
to be the last chance. If no one votes (except me) we remain status-quo.
If option YADE-*** will be among winners, the new name (a ***) will be
prefixed with YADE- to make smooth transition between new name and old
name.
--
# Janek Kozicki
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:06:59 +0200
From: V?clav ?milauer <eudoxos@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Yade-users] new name - voting (updated list).
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <462DD6C3.2080408@xxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
We could have voted on the wiki, either in separate colums for all votes
(so
I would add 5(VS) to the name I want give +5) or in comments. But there
we
go. Do I ahve to rate all names? I deleted those that are already used
("yes"), so they count as 0...? My average is below 5, I fear...
Regards, Vaclav
> Points | Name | used? | description
> -------------------------------------------
> 3 | Barite | no |
> 0 | BVPPlatform | no |
> 0 | Carss | no | Computational And Research Software
for Scientists
> 1 | Dcp | maybe | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
> 8 | Democrite | no |
> 7 | Edy | no | explicit dynamics
> 3 | Edyc | no | explicit dynamic code
> 9 | Eklogit | no |
> 5 | Eos | maybe | Extensible Open Simulation
> 6 | Leukippos | no |
> 0 | Nodem | no | Not Only Discrete Element Method
> 10 | Obsidian | maybe | O(b)pen S(i)oftware for D(i)ynamic
ANalysis.
> 0 | Odcp | ..no | open dynamic computation platfrom
> 1 | Odin | maybe | Open Dynamic computatIoN platform
> 1 | Odyssee | ..no | Open DYnamic Simulation Software for
various Element methods
> 0 | Ofec | maybe | open framework for explicit computing
> 0 | Ofex | no | open framework for explicit computing
> 0 | Ofexco | no | open framework for explicit computing
> 0 | Opendem | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method
> 0 | Opendemp | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method Platform
> 0 | Opex | no | open platform for explicit computing
> 0 | Opexco | no | open platform for explicit computing
> 2 | Oppenheimer | no |
> 9 | Oppie | ..no | (program Opie already exists)
> 7 | Opsidyan | no | open software in dynamic analysis
> 1 | Ospem | no | open source platform for explicit
methods
> 0 | Ox-frame | no | open explicit framework (obviously :))
> 0 | Oxnam | no | open and explicit
[ good name for a dumb program... ox-name? ]
> 0 | Pdm | maybe | Platform for Dynamical Modeling
> 10 | Pyrite | ..no |
> 8 | Skarn | no |
> 2 | Sweet | no | Scientific Workbench for Explicit
Engineering Theories
> 7 | Vidaic | no | Vidaic Is Delivering An Interplatform
Computation
[ which is not true ATM ]
> 5 | Yade | no | current name. You can vote for that
too.
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:10:25 +0200
From: Janek Kozicki <cosurgi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Yade-users] voting - last chance :)
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20070424121025.5951ebfc@absurd>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Points | Name | used? | description
-------------------------------------------
| YADE-*** | no | prefix the winnning name with "YADE-"
for smooth name transition
| Barite | no |
| BVPPlatform | no |
| Carss | no | Computational And Research Software for
Scientists
| Dcp | maybe | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
| Democrite | no |
| Dicop | yes | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
| Edy | no | explicit dynamics
| Edyc | no | explicit dynamic code
| Eklogit | no |
| Eos | maybe | Extensible Open Simulation
| Genesis | yes |
| Isis | yes | (egyptian mythology)
| Leukippos | no |
| Nemesis | yes | (greek mythology)
| Newton | yes | sorry already used
| Nodem | no | Not Only Discrete Element Method
| Obsidian | maybe | O(b)pen S(i)oftware for D(i)ynamic
ANalysis.
| Odcp | ..no | open dynamic computation platfrom
| Odin | maybe | Open Dynamic computatIoN platform
| Odyssee | ..no | Open DYnamic Simulation Software for
various Element methods
| Ofec | maybe | open framework for explicit computing
| Ofex | no | open framework for explicit computing
| Ofexco | no | open framework for explicit computing
| Opec | yes | open platform for explicit computing
| OpenDEM | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method
| OpenDEM+ | no | "Open DEM Plus" - more than just DEM
| OpenDEMP | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method Platform
| Opex | no | open platform for explicit computing
| Opexco | no | open platform for explicit computing
| Oppenheimer | no |
| Oppie | ..no | (program Opie already exists)
| Opsidyan | no | open software in dynamic analysis
| Ospem | no | open source platform for explicit
methods
| Ox-frame | no | open explicit framework (obviously :))
| Oxnam | no | open and explicit
| Pdm | maybe | Platform for Dynamical Modeling
| Pnm | yes | Platform For Numerical Modeling
| Pyrite | ..no |
| Skarn | no |
| Sweet | no | Scientific Workbench for Explicit
Engineering Theories
| Vidaic | no | Vidaic Is Delivering An Interplatform
Computation
| YADE | no | current name. You can vote for that too.
--
# Janek Kozicki
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:15:27 +0200
From: Janek Kozicki <cosurgi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Yade-users] new name considerations
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20070424121527.7dba0a85@absurd>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Well, looks like nobody wants to vote. So perhaps it was a wrong idea
after all. But anyway, let's finish this. The only voices I get is to
use the name OpenDEM, prefixed with YADE to make the transition more
smooth.
I agree that YADE-*** prefix is a very good way to make the
transition more smooth. So I add this as a voting option. And maybe,
if at last some people will vote, we will use the winning name in
place of ***. So the new name we will be YADE-***
Frederic and Ahmed suggested names for particular packages, like:
> BVPPlatform | DEM
> BVPPlatform | FEM
> YADE-openDEM
> YADE-openFEM
> YADE-openBEAM
as you can see, the problem is that yade is not only for DEM, it can
handle more than just DEM. That's why I think that name OpenDEM will
be a bit misleading. Perhaps the idea from Stefan: "OpenDEM Plus"
would be less misleading.... I'll add this as another voting options.
So I am going to post an update list of names to vote. And that is
going to be the last chance. If no one votes (except me) we remain
status-quo.
If option YADE-*** will be among winners, the new name (a ***) will
be prefixed with YADE- to make smooth transition between new name and
old name.
--
# Janek Kozicki
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:20:33 +0200
From: Janek Kozicki <cosurgi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Yade-users] my votes :)
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <20070424122033.4f91b321@absurd>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
well OK. here are my votes. BTW in OpenOffice spreadsheed it's
possible to sort data according to selected column. So I sorted here
by number of points :)
10 Nodem no Not Only Discrete Element Method
9 YADE-*** no prefix the winnning name with "YADE-"
for smooth name transition
9 Edyc no explicit dynamic code
8 Pyrite ..no
8 Ofec maybe open framework for explicit computing
8 Skarn no
8 Eos maybe Extensible Open Simulation
7 OpenDEM+ no "Open DEM Plus" - more than just DEM
7 Odyssee ..no Open DYnamic Simulation Software for
various Element methods
7 Sweet no Scientific Workbench for Explicit
Engineering Theories
7 Ospem no open source platform for explicit
methods
7 Obsidian maybe O(b)pen S(i)oftware for D(i)ynamic
ANalysis.
7 Odin maybe Open Dynamic computatIoN platform
7 Opex no open platform for explicit computing
6 Ox-frame no open explicit framework (obviously :))
6 Eklogit no
6 Barite no
6 Vidaic no Vidaic Is Delivering An Interplatform
Computation
6 Democrite no
6 Edy no explicit dynamics
6 Opsidyan no open software in dynamic analysis
6 Ofex no open framework for explicit computing
6 Leukippos no
6 Oxnam no open and explicit
5 OpenDEM ..no the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method
5 Ofexco no open framework for explicit computing
5 Yade no current name. You can vote for that
too.
4 Odcp ..no open dynamic computation platfrom
4 Oppenheimer no
3 Oppie ..no (program Opie already exists)
3 Carss no Computational And Research Software for
Scientists
3 Opexco no open platform for explicit computing
3 Opec yes open platform for explicit computing
2 Pdm maybe Platform for Dynamical Modeling
2 Dcp maybe dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
2 Newton yes sorry already used
2 Nemesis yes (greek mythology)
2 OpenDEMP ..no the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method Platform
2 Pnm yes Platform For Numerical Modeling
1 Genesis yes
1 Isis yes (egyptian mythology)
0 Dicop yes dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:26:10 +0200
From: Lionel Favier <lfavier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Yade-users] new name vote
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <462EF482.3040109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
hi, here is my vote
Points | Name | used? | description
-------------------------------------------
10 | YADE-*** | no | prefix the winnning name with "YADE-"
for smooth name transition
0 | Barite | no |
0 | BVPPlatform | no |
8 | Carss | no | Computational And Research Software for
Scientists
0 | Dcp | maybe | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
0 | Democrite | no |
0 | Dicop | yes | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
4 | Edy | no | explicit dynamics
4 | Edyc | no | explicit dynamic code
0 | Eklogit | no |
5 | Eos | maybe | Extensible Open Simulation
0 | Genesis | yes |
6 | Isis | yes | (egyptian mythology)
0 | Leukippos | no |
5 | Nemesis | yes | (greek mythology)
0 | Newton | yes | sorry already used
5 | Nodem | no | Not Only Discrete Element Method
5 | Obsidian | maybe | O(b)pen S(i)oftware for D(i)ynamic
ANalysis.
0 | Odcp | ..no | open dynamic computation platfrom
8 | Odin | maybe | Open Dynamic computatIoN platform
8 | Odyssee | ..no | Open DYnamic Simulation Software for
various Element methods
0 | Ofec | maybe | open framework for explicit computing
0 | Ofex | no | open framework for explicit computing
0 | Ofexco | no | open framework for explicit computing
0 | Opec | yes | open platform for explicit computing
0 | OpenDEM | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method
0 | OpenDEM+ | no | "Open DEM Plus" - more than just DEM
0 | OpenDEMP | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method Platform
0 | Opex | no | open platform for explicit computing
0 | Opexco | no | open platform for explicit computing
2 | Oppenheimer | no |
2 | Oppie | ..no | (program Opie already exists)
5 | Opsidyan | no | open software in dynamic analysis
0 | Ospem | no | open source platform for explicit
methods
0 | Ox-frame | no | open explicit framework (obviously :))
0 | Oxnam | no | open and explicit
0 | Pdm | maybe | Platform for Dynamical Modeling
0 | Pnm | yes | Platform For Numerical Modeling
0 | Pyrite | ..no |
0 | Skarn | no |
6 | Sweet | no | Scientific Workbench for Explicit
Engineering Theories
0 | Vidaic | no | Vidaic Is Delivering An Interplatform
Computation
8 | YADE | no | current name. You can vote for that too.
have a good day
Lionel Favier
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 11:33:58 +0200
From: Shiu Wenjie <wen-jie.shiu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Yade-users] voting
To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <462F2086.9080007@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi, here are my votes!!!!
> Points | Name | used? | description
> -------------------------------------------
> 10 | YADE-*** | no | prefix the winnning name with "YADE-"
for smooth name transition
> 0 | Barite | no |
> 0 | BVPPlatform | no |
> 2 | Carss | no | Computational And Research Software
for Scientists
> 1 | Dcp | maybe | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
> 0 | Democrite | no |
> 0 | Dicop | yes | dynamic/discrete computation platfrom
> 0 | Edy | no | explicit dynamics
> 0 | Edyc | no | explicit dynamic code
> 0 | Eklogit | no |
> 3 | Eos | maybe | Extensible Open Simulation
> 0 | Genesis | yes |
> 0 | Isis | yes | (egyptian mythology)
> 0 | Leukippos | no |
> 0 | Nemesis | yes | (greek mythology)
> 0 | Newton | yes | sorry already used
> 7 | Nodem | no | Not Only Discrete Element Method
> 5 | Obsidian | maybe | O(b)pen S(i)oftware for D(i)ynamic
ANalysis.
> 4 | Odcp | ..no | open dynamic computation platfrom
> 4 | Odin | maybe | Open Dynamic computatIoN platform
> 4 | Odyssee | ..no | Open DYnamic Simulation Software for
various Element methods
> 3 | Ofec | maybe | open framework for explicit computing
> 3 | Ofex | no | open framework for explicit computing
> 3 | Ofexco | no | open framework for explicit computing
> 0 | Opec | yes | open platform for explicit computing
> 5 | OpenDEM | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method
> 6 | OpenDEM+ | no | "Open DEM Plus" - more than just DEM
> 5 | OpenDEMP | ..no | the Open source Discrete and
Explicit/Element Method Platform
> 5 | Opex | no | open platform for explicit computing
> 5 | Opexco | no | open platform for explicit computing
> 2 | Oppenheimer | no |
> 0 | Oppie | ..no | (program Opie already exists)
> 6 | Opsidyan | no | open software in dynamic analysis
> 3 | Ospem | no | open source platform for explicit
methods
> 3 | Ox-frame | no | open explicit framework (obviously :))
> 2 | Oxnam | no | open and explicit
> 4 | Pdm | maybe | Platform for Dynamical Modeling
> 4 | Pnm | yes | Platform For Numerical Modeling
> 2 | Pyrite | ..no |
> 1 | Skarn | no |
> 5 | Sweet | no | Scientific Workbench for Explicit
Engineering Theories
> 3 | Vidaic | no | Vidaic Is Delivering An Interplatform
Computation
> 8 | YADE | no | current name. You can vote for that
too.
>
>
Regards
wenjie
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Yade-users mailing list
Yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
End of Yade-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 13
******************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Yade-users mailing list
Yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/yade-users
Follow ups
