yade-users team mailing list archive

[chiara modenese <c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7 April 2010 08:55, Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yes. But for now, they can have funny features, like mass=0 and such, if
> you use TT preprocessor.
> I don't guarantee immediate result, but it should give the dynamic behavior
> of of a parallelepiped if you check a few details.
> Jerome mentionned that there are no box-box interaction, there could be
> problems with contacts on the edges and vertices as well, according to
> Vaclav, but this is probably not what you need?
>

Hi,
I have a colleague in Italy that is studying masonry structures and that
would like to approach the dem for this purpose. He actually needs
interactions between boxes. Would Yade be suitable for this kind of project?
Would be the implementation part, eventually needed, achievable (although I
do not know the c++ knowledge of this guy)?
cheers, chiara


>
> Bruno
>
> Luc Sibille a écrit :
>
>  Hi all,
>>
>>  I just would like to obtain a confirmation: walls composing the box of
>> the triaxial test are "particles" as the spheres composing the sample, they
>> just have the shape of a parallelepiped? I mean if I fix these walls as
>> dynamic bodies, they will move according to the second-Newton's law?
>>
>> Best, Luc
>>
>>
>
> --
> _______________
> Bruno Chareyre
> Associate Professor
> Grenoble INP
> Lab. 3SR
> BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France
> Tél : 33 4 56 52 86 21
> Fax : 33 4 76 82 70 43
> ________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
> Post to     : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>