yade-users team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Question #668224]: Clarrifying output of tesselationWrapper for pore size

To: yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: rhaven <question668224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:32:21 -0000
Reply-to: question668224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Question #668224 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/668224

    Status: Answered => Open

rhaven is still having a problem:
Hi Bruno,
I compibled yade with the additional flag: -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=-DTWOPHASEFLOW
Then, using the code below I am able to export details about the pore network. 
    TwoPhase=TwoPhaseFlowEngine()
    TwoPhase.initialization()
    TwoPhase.savePoreNetwork()

To test it out, I took a packing of many clumps, and exported the pore network, then compressed the packing and exported the pore network again. 
I then compare the two PoreBodyRadius.txt files which are saved out by ->savePoreNetwork(), I see there is a minor change, however, most of the pore radii have a value of 3.58352e-09 in both files.  (Both files are attached below)

Some hopefully useful info:
Screenshot of packing uncompressed:
http://pasteall.org/pic/c4ea0606ccf1f05d34fd2f4d3f137924
PoreBodyRadius.txt uncompressed: 
http://pasteall.org/939654/text

Screenshot of packing compressed:
http://pasteall.org/pic/d0d01e9550c2c89c78872089682f72a8
PoreBodyRadius.txt compressed:
http://pasteall.org/939656/text

Do you know what I might be missing? Please let me know if I can provide
other clarifying information

many thanks
Jesse

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.