zim-wiki team mailing list archive

[Jaap Karssenberg <jaap.karssenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem <
svenn.bjerkem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> What I propose is the idea to add the question mark to lower the priority.
> In the example above, you can see that the task has had a high priority or
> importance in the beginning, and then the priority has been pushed back.
>

I'm open to the sugegstion, and have been thinking myself along this line
as well. Basically assuming all issues are created equal, but some loosing
importance over time.

I even thought about using the "?" for that - but I rejected it because I
also have quite a few action items where the action is a question and a "?"
naturally occurs in the description. So wondering if we could find another
notation that is natural but less likely to occur in task descriptions on
it;s own.

It is often useful, when evaluating execution of projects, to know how
> items were prioritized.
>

I usually use sub-bullets to add additional info, follow up comments etc.
and changes in prio / due date.

Regards,

Jaap