coapp-developers team mailing list archive

["William A. Rowe Jr." <wmrowe@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/18/2010 1:01 PM, Ted Bullock wrote:
> On 18/05/2010 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 5/18/2010 12:55 PM, Ted Bullock wrote:
>>>
>>> For instance here is the ISC license, it is small, easy to understand,
>>> and I never ever get confused about what my responsibilities are.
>>> """
>>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
>>> purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>>> copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>>    """
>>
>> Where are you granted use of applicable patents?
> 
> You aren't then again I'm pretty sure there was patent language in the
> codeplex agreement.

Precisely my point; no reciprocal patent license from the CPF for the resulting
body of work?  Now that sets all sorts of alarms.