coapp-developers team mailing list archive

[Andrew Fenn <andrewfenn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Since there is a conflict between APL 2.0 and BSD how about a
compromise. We could use the BSD license and attach a patent clause to
it.

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:56 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wmrowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 5/18/2010 1:01 PM, Ted Bullock wrote:
>> On 18/05/2010 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> On 5/18/2010 12:55 PM, Ted Bullock wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For instance here is the ISC license, it is small, easy to understand,
>>>> and I never ever get confused about what my responsibilities are.
>>>> """
>>>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
>>>> purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
>>>> copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
>>>    """
>>>
>>> Where are you granted use of applicable patents?
>>
>> You aren't then again I'm pretty sure there was patent language in the
>> codeplex agreement.
>
> Precisely my point; no reciprocal patent license from the CPF for the resulting
> body of work?  Now that sets all sorts of alarms.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
> Post to     : coapp-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>