coapp-developers team mailing list archive

["Rivera, Rafael" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was referring to the actual in-lining, not the code. It'll need to be
separated out to a proper .asm file before running through the Microsoft
compilers. Not sure if this artificial limitation exists in gcc land,
I'm guessing not.

/rafael

On 5/18/2010 7:54 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/18/2010 3:32 PM, Rivera, Rafael wrote:
>   
>> Sadly, some of OpenSSL's assembly implementations are inline hacks (e.g.
>> bignum). This is going to be a pain to port to x64... using Microsoft's
>> compilers.
>>     
> The x86_64 work is already complete, AFAICT.  There is an issue that the team
> had planned to deprecate ML, but I suspect that it can be revived when relying
> on ml64 form the latest toolchain release.
>