coapp-developers team mailing list archive

["William A. Rowe Jr." <wmrowe@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/18/2010 11:10 PM, Nasser Dassi wrote:
> 
> If we are talking about CoApp-compiled software, then we should adopt
> the most transparent license.  Why?  Because we are not usurping
> licensing of the source code; we are simply re-packaging the source
> code... so, broadly speaking, we should protect all other licensing
> choices by stating that COAPP-COMPILED SOFTWARE HONORS THE LICENSING
> SCHEME AS CHOSEN BY THE ORIGINAL AUTHORS.  

+1!  Other than the fact that we have limited choices (GPL won't magically
become BSD in our hands), this speaks volumes to what CoApp is seeking to do,
which is honor the creation, and intent of the package authors.