dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02404
Re: Future work
Ok, good to know. Any ideas on what would be the best solution?
/Johan
> You most definitely don't want to use the d-1 dimensional element of
> the same type. Works great for Lagrange (and actually Hermite, for
> what it's worth), but is disastrously catastrophic for everything else.
>
>
> On Apr 12, 2006, at 8:29 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 15:09 +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:30 +0200, Johan Hoffman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Apart from the issue of duplicating code with or without
>>>> templates, what
>>>> do we need to figure out to get the assembly of boundary integrals
>>>> correct?
>>>>
>>>> Do we have a clear way to obtain the FE basis for the boundary of
>>>> a cell
>>>> given the basis of the cell? Do we use the corresponding basis
>>>> for for d-1
>>>> dimensions?
>>>>
>>>> /Johan
>>>>
>>>
>>> This will have to come from FFC won't it? It might be less efficient,
>>> but we could work with the finite element of the whole cell and
>>> perhaps
>>> the edge/face number is enough for FFC to do the rest.
>>
>> Thinking about this some more, it might be better not to restrict the
>> finite element basis to the boundary in order to work with problems
>> where derivatives of the basis functions appear in the boundary
>> integrals, and hence involve all nodes of the element. Similar
>> story for
>> non-conforming elements.
>>
>> Garth
>>
>>
>>> I noticed that
>>> the FFC-produced function eval takes "unsigned int boundary" as an
>>> argument, but doesn't do anything with it yet.
>>>
>>> Garth
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>>> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>
Follow ups
References
-
Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-03
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-03
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-04
-
Re: Future work
From: Johan Hoffman, 2006-04-04
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-04
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-10
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-10
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-11
-
Re: Future work
From: Anders Logg, 2006-04-11
-
Re: Future work
From: Johan Hoffman, 2006-04-12
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-12
-
Re: Future work
From: Garth N. Wells, 2006-04-12
-
Re: Future work
From: Robert C. Kirby, 2006-04-12