dolfin team mailing list archive
-
dolfin team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #09228
Re: XML format for Higher Order meshes
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:03:06PM -0400, Shawn Walker wrote:
> I see that you want to keep the mesh topology separated from the
> geometry, right? But, even now, this is slightly violated in the current
> .xml format, because with each vertex index, you give the coordinates.
> If all you wanted was the topology, then the coordinates would not be
> necessary. The coordinates are only need to make sense of the geometry of
> the mesh (i.e. whether there is overlap of triangles or inverted
> triangles, etc). So, technically, there should be a list of topological
> vertices and a separate list of geometric vertices.
>
> Is this what you mean?
>
> - Shawn
Yes. We might need to break the XML format by having a <topology> tag
and a <geometry> tag which are separate.
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References