dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:24:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >> Anders Logg wrote:
> >>> Are there any objections to making a new release (0.9.5)?
> >>>
> >> No, as long as you clean up the copious quantities of debugging output
> >> which is being printed to the screen ;).
> >
> > I will.
> >
> >> Also, we should look at the DOLFIN Blueprints to see if anything else
> >> should be done before a release.
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> >> If a release is made, I would like the next one to focus on the
> >> Blueprints. There are some very important but non-trivial targets, like
> >> more general parallel assembly, which should be addressed sooner rather
> >> than later.
> >
> > Yes, 0.9.6 should be focused on bug fixes/blueprints. Parallel DG
> > assembly is important
>
> Not just DG - the symmetric application of boundary conditions is very
> important too.
>
> > but it's not at the top of my list of
> > priorities.
> >
>
> That's why we need to sometimes stick to the Blueprints - make sure that
> important tasks don't get neglected.

Yes, but parallel DG assembly is not very important for me.

--
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature