dolfin team mailing list archive

["Garth N. Wells" <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx>]

Anders Logg wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:24:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > > > Anders Logg wrote:
> > > > > Are there any objections to making a new release (0.9.5)?
> > > > No, as long as you clean up the copious quantities of debugging output
> > > > which is being printed to the screen ;).
> > > I will.
> > >
> > > > Also, we should look at the DOLFIN Blueprints to see if anything else
> > > > should be done before a release.
> > > Sure.
> > >
> > > > If a release is made, I would like the next one to focus on the
> > > > Blueprints. There are some very important but non-trivial targets, like
> > > > more general parallel assembly, which should be addressed sooner rather
> > > > than later.
> > > Yes, 0.9.6 should be focused on bug fixes/blueprints. Parallel DG
> > > assembly is important
> > Not just DG - the symmetric application of boundary conditions is very
> > important too.
> >
> > > but it's not at the top of my list of
> > > priorities.
> > That's why we need to sometimes stick to the Blueprints - make sure that
> > important tasks don't get neglected.
>
> Yes, but parallel DG assembly is not very important for me.

There is more than one Blueprint on the list.

Garth

> --
> Anders
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> DOLFIN-dev@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev