dolfin team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:27:12AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
>
>
> On 23/02/11 09:20, Anders Logg wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:32:16AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23/02/11 08:21, Anders Logg wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:13:29AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 23/02/11 07:41, Anders Logg wrote:
> >>>>> It seems tomorrow's Ubuntb deadline is really the deadline for Johannes to
> >>>>> upload the new packages to Debian, which means we need to finish the
> >>>>> new release today.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I suggest that we just go ahead and make the release of 0.9.10 as is
> >>>>> *now* (or sometime this evening). The buildbot is very green and any
> >>>>> last-minute fixes might very well break it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> There are some straightforward fixes that should be made. Two things I
> >>>> would like fixed are
> >>>>
> >>>>  - https://bugs.launchpad.net/dolfin/+bug/714509
> >>>
> >>> ok. Just go ahead.
> >>>
> >>>>  - refine -> adapt and add back old refine, as agreed.
> >>>
> >>> This has already been fixed in Marie's branch so please wait for her
> >>> to merge.
> >>>
> >>
> >> As long as it's before the release ;)
> >>
> >> When we agree a straightforward change, it's not ideal that the change
> >> stays in a personal branch for an extended period.
> >
> > The problem is it was not a straightforward (for us). The whole
> > business with adapt/refine is tied to quite a big effort to port the
> > adaptivity to C++.
> >
>
> The renaming of functions and restoration of the refine(...) is
> straightforward . I'm not referring to the details of the adaptivity
> code, which I know is complex.

I understand, but the renaming of the functions were tied to large
changes in the new adaptivity code. Anyway, it will be fixed before
0.9.10 so all is well.

--
Anders