fenics team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

True, but the last 5 or so releases have all (with some exceptions)
been coordinated, like the last one which was 1.0-beta for all
components. But I see the point.

--
Anders


On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:37:44PM +0200, Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
> Different packages evolve in different ways, some are very stable, while
> others are not. It seems unnecessary to make all have the same numbering. 
>
> On 15 August 2011 16:15, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>      We've started on this discussion before but have never come to a
>      conclusion.
>
>      What version numbers should we use for FEniCS itself and the
>      individual packages?
>
>      Before, we have let all packages have their own version numbers, and
>      then released FEniCS yy--mm (like 2011-06, 2011-12 etc) containing a
>      collection of the other packages with some specific (but unrelated)
>      version numbers.
>
>      Another option is to use the same version numbers for all packages,
>      including FEniCS itself.
>
>      The question comes up now and needs to be resolved since Johannes is
>      about to create a release of the meta-package fenics, either 1.0-beta
>      or 2011-08.
>
>      Thoughts?
>
>
>      _______________________________________________
>      Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
>      Post to     : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>      Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
>      More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>