fenics team mailing list archive
-
fenics team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01582
Re: Version numbers
Agree with Kent. For example UFL and UFC will hopefully be more stable
than DOLFIN.
FEniCS-2011-08 does not sound like a beta though,
can it be FEniCS-2011-08-beta? Or FEniCS-2011-09-beta
since the final will likely be FEniCS-2011-09?
Martin
On 15 August 2011 23:48, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> True, but the last 5 or so releases have all (with some exceptions)
> been coordinated, like the last one which was 1.0-beta for all
> components. But I see the point.
>
> --
> Anders
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:37:44PM +0200, Kent-Andre Mardal wrote:
>> Different packages evolve in different ways, some are very stable, while
>> others are not. It seems unnecessary to make all have the same numbering.
>>
>> On 15 August 2011 16:15, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> We've started on this discussion before but have never come to a
>> conclusion.
>>
>> What version numbers should we use for FEniCS itself and the
>> individual packages?
>>
>> Before, we have let all packages have their own version numbers, and
>> then released FEniCS yy--mm (like 2011-06, 2011-12 etc) containing a
>> collection of the other packages with some specific (but unrelated)
>> version numbers.
>>
>> Another option is to use the same version numbers for all packages,
>> including FEniCS itself.
>>
>> The question comes up now and needs to be resolved since Johannes is
>> about to create a release of the meta-package fenics, either 1.0-beta
>> or 2011-08.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
>> Post to : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> Post to : fenics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fenics
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References