fuel-dev team mailing list archive

[Anastasia Urlapova <aurlapova@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,  Dmitry
>> QA team, please help in testing. All, we need to land this sooner than
later - otherwise Dmitry will have to rebase all the time. Let's help in
reviewing

Of course, we help in testing,
system tests will run for night and tomorrow I'll give Dmitry's iso to
QA-team for manual testing.


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko <
dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The ISO I've built yesterday is
> fuel-4.1.ceph.20140210.2016-centos-6.4-x86_64.iso, available at
> mnv-dev-01:arch/ and srv11:/var/www/fuelweb-iso/. I'm testing it now
> in KVM as Ubuntu HA with Neutron/GRE + Ceilometer & Savanna.
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko
> <dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 1 - this is not a typo, this bug prevents the rest of the fix from
> finishing
> > deployment, so a fix had to be included for the whole patch to remain
> > testable. The primary bug makes Ceilometer deployment unreliable, so
> the're
> > is not much point in separating the fixes.
> >
> > 2 - I had an iso build kicked off in MNV yesterday, I can share it when I
> > get to the office. In addition to this patch, patched haproxy packages
> are
> > required to build an ISO, there's OSCI build link in Jira.
> >
> > -DmitryB
> >
> >
> > On Feb 10, 2014 10:06 PM, "Matthew Mosesohn" <mmosesohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dmitry, two questions:
> >> 1 - How does this patch relate to
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1278603 ? Is it a typo? It's
> >> related to logging, not haproxy.
> >> 2 - Is there an ISO already available for testing?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko
> >> <dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > For the past few weeks, I've been working on a big refactoring of
> >> > HAProxy related manifests in Fuel Library, and now I am finally
> >> > satisfied with how these manifests work in Ubuntu and CentOS.
> >> >
> >> > It started as a fix for LP bug #1264388 and has brought up a long
> >> > chain of problems that had to be resolved before the original problem
> >> > could be addressed. The result is a massive 1318 line review request
> >> > that completely rewrites the haproxy module (based on latest upstream
> >> > version), refactors the haproxy parts of cluster and openstack
> >> > modules, and touches osnailyfacter, galera, neutron, and ceilometer
> >> > modules:
> >> >
> >> > https://review.openstack.org/65591
> >> >
> >> > The primary purpose of this change is to make sure that HAProxy
> >> > listening services can be enabled one at a time, after the
> >> > corresponding backend service is configured and started (and releases
> >> > the VIP if that's their default configuration), and before other
> >> > services that require that service to be available via a VIP. The
> >> > benefits are a more reliable and predictable HA deployment process,
> >> > reduced coupling between our Puppet modules, and ability to put more
> >> > services behind HAProxy without any impact on the core services.
> >> >
> >> > Please review this change and help me test it. See comments on the
> >> > review for a list of configurations where this was tested, if this
> >> > works for you in another configuration, please +1 and specify the
> >> > configuration you used.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Dmitry Borodaenko
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> >> > Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> >> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Borodaenko
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> Post to     : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>