fuel-dev team mailing list archive
-
fuel-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00407
Re: Code review and testing needed: HAProxy related manifests refactoring
The ISO I've built yesterday is
fuel-4.1.ceph.20140210.2016-centos-6.4-x86_64.iso, available at
mnv-dev-01:arch/ and srv11:/var/www/fuelweb-iso/. I'm testing it now
in KVM as Ubuntu HA with Neutron/GRE + Ceilometer & Savanna.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko
<dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1 - this is not a typo, this bug prevents the rest of the fix from finishing
> deployment, so a fix had to be included for the whole patch to remain
> testable. The primary bug makes Ceilometer deployment unreliable, so the're
> is not much point in separating the fixes.
>
> 2 - I had an iso build kicked off in MNV yesterday, I can share it when I
> get to the office. In addition to this patch, patched haproxy packages are
> required to build an ISO, there's OSCI build link in Jira.
>
> -DmitryB
>
>
> On Feb 10, 2014 10:06 PM, "Matthew Mosesohn" <mmosesohn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Dmitry, two questions:
>> 1 - How does this patch relate to
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1278603 ? Is it a typo? It's
>> related to logging, not haproxy.
>> 2 - Is there an ISO already available for testing?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko
>> <dborodaenko@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > For the past few weeks, I've been working on a big refactoring of
>> > HAProxy related manifests in Fuel Library, and now I am finally
>> > satisfied with how these manifests work in Ubuntu and CentOS.
>> >
>> > It started as a fix for LP bug #1264388 and has brought up a long
>> > chain of problems that had to be resolved before the original problem
>> > could be addressed. The result is a massive 1318 line review request
>> > that completely rewrites the haproxy module (based on latest upstream
>> > version), refactors the haproxy parts of cluster and openstack
>> > modules, and touches osnailyfacter, galera, neutron, and ceilometer
>> > modules:
>> >
>> > https://review.openstack.org/65591
>> >
>> > The primary purpose of this change is to make sure that HAProxy
>> > listening services can be enabled one at a time, after the
>> > corresponding backend service is configured and started (and releases
>> > the VIP if that's their default configuration), and before other
>> > services that require that service to be available via a VIP. The
>> > benefits are a more reliable and predictable HA deployment process,
>> > reduced coupling between our Puppet modules, and ability to put more
>> > services behind HAProxy without any impact on the core services.
>> >
>> > Please review this change and help me test it. See comments on the
>> > review for a list of configurations where this was tested, if this
>> > works for you in another configuration, please +1 and specify the
>> > configuration you used.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dmitry Borodaenko
>> >
>> > --
>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> > Post to : fuel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~fuel-dev
>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Dmitry Borodaenko
Follow ups
References