← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: Re: Compilation with Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition.

 

Few moths ago I compiled with success with Visual Studio C++ Express edition pcbnew and eeschema, but nobody of the developer group's man give me some help. They are unterested in this. Pherhaps they can't understand the power of the Visual Studio debugger.
I'm sorry for them.

Thank you,
I don't' want to hurt the sensibility of nobody, it was onlymy thoughts....

Bye,
VeryHardLeo


Alain M. ha scritto:

This is distressing, do I understand correctly that someone originaly
bought one copy of DialogBlocks and generated the dialogs? And if new
dialogs are needed only he can do it?

I have seen in the last few months that the Kicad team is very cautious
about licences. Is this some marginal case?

Alain

Richard A Burton escreveu:
> 2008/8/27 Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@... <mailto:stambaughw%40verizon.net>>:
>> You might want to take a look at the license for DialogBlocks
>> <http://www.anthemion.co.uk/dialogblocks/faq.htm#license <http://www.anthemion.co.uk/dialogblocks/faq.htm#license>> that is used
>> to layout most of the dialog boxes in Kicad. It is neither open source
>> or free as in beer. I did a quick grep of some of the dialog sources
>> managed by DialogBlocks and they were all created with an unregistered
>> (demo) version of DialogBlocks. So even if there is an agreement
>> (verbal or written) between the Kicad project and the developer of
>> DialogBlocks, it can change at any time and require nearly all of the
>> dialog boxes to be rewritten.
>
> It doesn't mean anything like that. In fact it specifically states:
> "Are there licensing restrictions on the generated code?
> No. You can treat the resulting code as if you had written it
> yourself from scratch."
>
> Yes the license could be changed, but that would only be applicable to
> code generated with a version of the tool distributed under that new
> license. It would not be applicable to existing code that has already
> been generated under this license, so there would be no need to
> recreate any dialog boxes. Spreading FUD about non-free applications
> is no better than spreading it about FOSS, so please try to avoid it.
>
> On the VC++ topic I don't understand why this has caused so much
> debate. If someone wants to add support for another compiler that's
> great, so long as they don't break any existing builds. It gives a
> wider development platform, which is a good thing. Remember open
> source is about choice, and you are perfectly free to choose to use a
> closed source free/paid compiler if you want to, for whatever reasons
> you want (and there are plenty of good and bad reasons/scenarios to do
> this).
>
> Richard.


Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo.
Controllato da AVG - http://www.avg.com Versione: 8.0.138 / Database dei virus: 270.6.9/1637 - Data di rilascio: 27/08/2008 7.01









References