kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: Re: libstdc++
Terry Barnaby <terry1@...>
Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:30:19 +0000
Dick Hollenbeck <dick@...>
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:220.127.116.11) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.3
On 25/03/10 14:42, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
Terry Barnaby wrote:
> As a matter of interest I presume kicad is thinking of making the
> available in simple tar form rather than packages as RPM or DEB
> I wonder how many users install from this type of package these days. I
> certainly haven't for many years.
> I wonder if it would be better to more closely work with the
> and Fedora/Centos packagers and help formulate standard *.spec etc files
> for kicad as part of the source tree ? This will make it easier for the
> packagers to package new releases and put it into the distribution's
> or main repositories.
> I note that someone was on this forum (Alain Portal?) recently asking for
> help to package for Fedora, Redhat EL5/Centos5 recently. They tend to
> know the particular distributions better and probably can help provide
> the basic testing for binary packages on the core used platforms out
> For the less used/maintained Linux distributions maybe kicad could
> and distribute a RPM and DEB package source package that can
> then be easily built by users (as well as the source in tar form) ? Also
> it would be possible to produce a generic binary RPM and DEB with
> statically linked libraries etc if needed.
If you would like to advance this from being a "good idea" to "actually
useful", feel free to gather up the spec files and offer them as a patch.
Good ideas usually simply disolve into a "wishlist graveyard" if nobody
does anything about them.
I was thinking of this more as a communication exercise between kicad
developers and Fedora/Ubuntu packagers.
For Fedora the 2010-03-14 packages (with SPEC files) are already in the
in the Fedora testing repository at:
I note that for Fedora two patches are applied:
and a source kicad-ld.conf
Looking at the SPEC files shows the things that the fedora packagers
had to do to build/install the package on that system. Maybe the above
patches and the SPEC file fixes can be integrated into kicads SVN tree ?
I can gather these up and offer them as a patch if that would be useful.