kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04858
Re: Default Field names patch
Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> You have good reading comprehension.
Heh, thanks :-)
> "template" aka "wanted", not "wanted" aka "template". The distinction
> is important since I have started coding it, and the source reflects the
> latter term.
Good. I like "template" much better than "wanted" as well.
> the user never sees this F4, F5, .. stuff.
Even in the absence of any templates ?
I guess what I'm not quite certain about yet is whether you're
completely getting rid of positional fields (except FP, value,
etc.), or whether the template/user-defined fields still have an
Fn "slot" associated with them.
For example, if you send me a symbol that contains one (and only
one) template field, and this field shows up as F6 = Manufacturer
on your system, would it also show up as F6 = Manufacturer on mine,
or could it show up in any of the F4/F5/... slots, depending on
what other templates live in my global configuration ?
Thanks a lot for explaining the rest !
- Werner
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2010-05-29
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2010-06-06
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-06-07
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-06-08
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2010-06-10
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-06-13
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-06-14
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-06-14
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Werner Almesberger, 2010-06-14
-
Re: Default Field names patch
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-06-14