Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
That said, if you pixel align these icons, we can require pixel alignment for any future, v6 icons. The next design round can size the graphical elements for alignment.
-S Am 2019-03-19 16:14, schrieb Jeff Young:
The blurry ones actually look better on a Retina display, but I’m OK with the others if they look better everywhere else. Cheers, Jeff.On 19 Mar 2019, at 19:54, Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Whew! I was starting worry about my vision there for minute :) On 3/19/2019 3:52 PM, John Beard wrote:D'oh, yes! Sorry, new ones on the right, I changed it and didn't change the text. Cheers, JohnOn Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 7:50 PM Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hey John,Are you sure the new icons aren't on the right? The ones on the left look blurry to me. Either may eyes are totally gone or the icons on theright are the aligned ones. Cheers, Wayne On 3/19/2019 3:43 PM, John Beard wrote:Hi, I plan to pixel align the module icons in Pcbnew, as they arecurrently blurry (and not even consistently blurry) - they're probably the worst offenders left for blurriness. Getting these aligned at 26px will be a good step towards hiDPI-aware scalable icons, as they willalso be aligned at 2x resolution.However, due to a quirk of the number 26, it's impossible to have thecurrent fat-ish pins, keep the pins and module centred in the icon,and have 3 pins to a side, and keep them all pixel aligned (which is why even the most-sharp current icon has blurry middle pins). So the pins are now a bit skinnier. Hence a quick check that these icons areacceptable.Comparison image attached (new icons on left). I haven't changed anymetaphors or the pin colours. Cheers, John
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |