Yes, just retag the 5.1.1 tags as 5.1.2 as well. We have done that
before and is probably what will have the least workload. :)
On Sun, 21 Apr 2019 at 23:44, Steven A. Falco <stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:stevenfalco@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On 4/21/19 5:18 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> It's looks like 5.1.1 has a serious issue which was fixed and
will be
> released in 5.1.2. Since folks have already started downloading
5.1.1,
> I don't think changing the 5.1.1 tag is a good idea. How much
trouble
> would it be to spin 5.1.2 and skip formally releasing 5.1.1?
I'm fine
> if we use the 5.1.1 libraries, documentation, and translations as
> nothing has change since 5.1.1 that would effect anything. I
figure
> this will give Adam some more time to get the macos release
out. I
> apologize in advance for dropping the ball on this.
My preference would be to tag all seven repositories with 5.1.2,
even if the 5.1.2 and 5.1.1 tags are on the same commit. That
way, the intent is very clear in the history of each repo.
Changing / reusing a tag once it has been pushed is never a good
idea, IMO.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
<https://launchpad.net/%7Ekicad-developers>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
