launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

["Francis J. Lacoste" <francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On August 5, 2009, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> У уто, 04. 08 2009. у 13:15 -0700, Jamu Kakar пише:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Guilherme Salgado<salgado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> > > Since we're already running fine against trunk, I think it's fine to
> > > keep that until they release a 0.15. I'd be against a 0.14.1 because
> > > 0.14 is already 6 months old.
> >
> > I'm in the process of preparing the 0.15 release.  It will be out by
> > the end of the week.
>
> I'd still be against going with 0.15, and being conservative for 3.0.
> We can go with 0.15 right after 3.0 is out.  By the time 3.0 gets out,
> we'll have zero real production testing of 0.15 (we'll have lots of
> staging testing, but that's sometimes just far enough from real
> production testing), and it means 3.0 might have a lot of unneeded
> little problems all around the place, damaging the image of
> Launchpad.net when we are hoping for a big splash with 3.0 announcement.
>
> Storm is one of our core components, and with Launchpad's diverse data
> set and many integration points that can fail, I'd say stabilize 3.0 on
> what Storm we have in 2.2.7.
>

I side with Danilo here. We should probably minimize the diverge in Storm 
between edge and lpnet since we aren't releasing for 2 months.

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.