launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00440
Re: how can we clean up the confusion of sourcecode vs. buildout?
On Aug 15, 2009, at 11:33 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
- We can continue to make sourcecode have fewer and fewer branches
so people don't think about it much if ever. I'm working on this--
the branch to put all the zope branches in buildout is in review!--
but maybe we shouldn't be waiting for this?
Hi Gary,
First, thanks for this information and for /all/ the great work
you've been doing on making our build environment sane(r :).
:-)
I can't speak for anybody else, but most of my confusion in this
area has been because we're in a transition. I'm sometimes
uncertain as to whether something's been moved into buildout or not,
so completing the task really seems like the best solution.
OK, cool.
Question: is the ultimate goal to completely get rid of sourcecode,
so that all packages come from buildout?
I just updated the Hacking document ( https://dev.launchpad.net/
Hacking#Buildout ) with the current answer, AIUI.
That was our original goal. We still want to shrink it to a very small
size, maybe to exclusively hold canonical-identify-provider and
shipit. We then might connect those in using develop eggs, rather than
symlinks in lib/.
If you need help getting some of this code reviewed, please ping me
and I'll make time to do it.
Thank you! I hope to take you up on that. :-)
Gary
References