launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

[Robert Collins <robertc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tom Haddon wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 15:22 -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
>> On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Tom Haddon wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 14:34 -0400, Karl Fogel wrote:
>>>>> Gary Poster <gary.poster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>> But Tom, does touching devpad affect production too?  If so, does
>>>>>> someone know if production is using storm from sourcecode or a tgz?
>>>>> Tom can give an authoritative answer about production, but we are
>>>>> *supposed* to have no devpad dependencies in Launchpad proper  
>>>>> now.  If
>>>>> we have any, it's a bug.
>>>> Do you mean I can remove all sourcecode directories? This isn't
>>>> something I was aware of, but would be more than happy to if it can  
>>>> be
>>>> confirmed.
>>>
>>> Karl is referring to how we build our developer instances.  We don't  
>>> use devpad for that.  We do use devpad for production.
>
> Ok, is this going to make our plans for a buildbot instance for
> production problematic? The problem is that currently it would always
> use the latest version of sourcecode dirs, when that might not actually
> be what we want in production....


Configs can specify exact revisions, if needed.

- -Rob
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkqdjd0ACgkQ42zgmrPGrq7sAACfbHHvymHUyOFHLgDNXRpFA/BE
lvYAn1eBqj7879C5plNx/zNNlXFXl3WG
=mnkC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----