launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00698
Today's project page review
Was taking a look at https://edge.launchpad.net/lilregcleaner and had a
few bits of feedback to give on the project page; perhaps these are
small enough bits that we can address pre-3.0. Here goes:
- First, WOW! This page looks really good! I'm happy to see the
results of the design cycles we did on it.
- A few improvements related to the downloads section:
* The links are downloaded, and they shouldn't be.
* The font for the files is too big, which leads to them being
super-truncated. I think the middle of the filename could be
truncated when too long (Little_[...]_3.0.tgz).
* The downloads are for a single release, but it doesn't say
anywhere what release it is for! One way to render it would be
with the the "released on" text, such as
for version 1.3.3, released on 2009-07-30
I'm pretty sure that will wrap; maybe the right way to handle
this is to use two separate lines, maybe the right way to
handle it is to put the version at the top:
Downloads
(for version 1.3.3)
.---------------------.
| |
'---------------------'
.---------------------.
| |
'---------------------'
.---------------------.
| |
'---------------------'
released on 2009-07-30
* When there are no downloads, the section looks a bit wonky:
https://edge.launchpad.net/libindicate
I wonder if the right solution to this problem is to say "No
downloads registered" and "No releases registered" to
non-owners, and "Add release" and "Add download files" to
owners. Or if we should just omit the section.
- The FAQs section says "List all FAQs" but the others say "All
questions", etc.
- The Series and milestones graph looks much better, and I'm happy
that the spacing and ordering works well enough, but the legend
"trunk" is at the beginning of the graph and that gets truncated
in the default rendering.
It appears we're defaulting the graph to showing centralized; why
don't we show it by default right-aligned, so the latest versions
appear there?
We had considered for projects with lots of series, like bzr,
rendering a taller viewport for it. Does that still make sense?
- The project title is repeated. Not only that, but it is also
editable in one place, but not in the other, and when you update
it, it doesn't update the second instance.
How to solve this is an interesting problem; perhaps the right way
is to allow the actual top-level title to be editable when the
content is editable, and have a customized callback hook per
content-object.
(The project display name still exists. Does that still need to
exist?)
- The Get Involved section buttons are almost there but not exactly
there yet:
* The underlining is a bit distracting; if you think
highlighting the whole row in gray works, let's do that.
* There is a horizontal line after the last item, which we
should omit.
* I think the font of the heading of that section is a bit too
large, and the background being white seems to imply to me
it's also a link, where it's actually a heading.
- When an announcement is truncated, I kind of miss a [more] link at
the end of the ellipsis. Is that not standard, or do we have a
standard?
Good work!
--
Christian Robottom Reis | [+55 16] 3376 0125 | http://launchpad.net/~kiko
| [+55 16] 9112 6430 | http://async.com.br/~kiko
Follow ups