launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03104
Re: RFC: naming of new bug status OPINION
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Martin Pool <mbp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 25 March 2010 01:13, Deryck Hodge <deryck.hodge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> The question I'm interested in getting help with here will make more
>> sense if you look at the LEP first:
>>
>> https://dev.launchpad.net/LEP/CloseBugsLeaveDiscussionsOpen
>
> That sounds good. I would suggest DISCUSSION too.
>
> Perhaps the LEP can also specify how this status would behave. After
> all it's already quite possible to continue discussion on a wontfix
> bug. Is it the same as wontfix in every regard except with a nicer
> name?
The LEP did say this in its way, but I've updated it to be extra explicit.
> istm you would like it to normally appear in user-oriented
> searches (filebug dupes) but not in developer-oriented lists.
>
I think this is a helpful distinction. I wonder if we even have a
structure for this in the tracker.
jml
Follow ups
References