On 06/04/10 14:03, James Westby wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss reviews of new code imports.
Currently SVN and CVS code imports require review before working. What
are the reasons for this?
Relevant documentation is at:
https://dev.launchpad.net/ReviewingCodeImports
Particular points are:
* For Subversion imports, the most important thing is that people don't
point the import at directory containing trunk, tags, branches
directories, and make a broken and resource-sucking import.
* Apparently Launchpad must not import from apache.org, but I can't see
why, because the bug is private.
The code import review setup process is a less than ideal part of the
Launchpad user experience - today I resorted to asking CHR on #launchpad
to expedite approval of an import of mine after it had sat for 5 days,
and I saw in scrollback that someone else was noting that they'd been
waiting for 2 weeks.
Assuming the problem is lack of people doing review, do I qualify as a
suitably clueful community member to apply for ~vcs-imports?
