launchpad-dev team mailing list archive

["Francis J. Lacoste" <francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On April 12, 2010, Tim Penhey wrote:
> Hi Deryck,
> 
> As discussed before I'm tackling the JFDI approach and I'm going to get the
> scanner to update the bug-task status [1].
> 
> I'd like the bug-task to be set to in-progress when it is linked to the
> branch, and fix-committed if it is linked to a branch that was marked as
> merged through a merge proposal.
> 
> Since the scanner is a script, what do you think the best approach is so
> that the appropriate subscribers get notified?  I had a brief look at the
> bug code but it was not clear to me exactly how to proceed.
> 
> Tim
> 
> [1] https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/406692
> 

Given the number of comments on this thread, I think this is an indication 
that the LEP approach would have been more useful:

"""
You definitely need to follow this process if

    ...
    * you have spent more than thirty minutes talking about the change without 
doing it 

"""

-- 
Francis J. Lacoste
francis.lacoste@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.