launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06209
Re: refreshed bug triage rules active
У чет, 13. 01 2011. у 18:02 -0500, Francis J. Lacoste пише:
> We have 59 time outs currently. This means that with the maintenance squads we
> can probably burn down the time out categories in a little more than a month!
I wouldn't be so sure of this. POFile:+translate fix would take
considerate effort or a visit to a mental institution after enough
exposure to POFile:+translate view code.
I am not sure how many of the timeout bugs we have of the sort, but I'd
say that fixing POFile:+translate so it scales reasonably well is an
effort of more than one engineer month.
> Then we have 165 oops. I contend that we don't need to fix most of these.
> There a lot of those that are probably not relevant anymore. Using the closing
> rate, we can burn down those in probably two more months. (And that's assuming
> a conservative ratio of 3 invalid for 7 fixes required. I'm sure that ratio is
> higher for OOPSes)
Actually, even though many of Translations OOPSes are old and hard to
get by (i.e. sometimes only rosetta admins can trigger them), they are
usually still relevant.
> This mean that we can reasonably expect to empty the Critical list before the
> end of the fiscal year.
>
> And then we'd have an empty Critical bucket like most of you want it and we
> can treat OOPS and Time outs for what they are: 'Critical' issues.
With this I agree, and that's why I agree we should keep them
'Critical'. Among other OOPSes and timeouts, I think POFile:+translate
page should be fixed and I think it should be something maintenance
teams should take on very soon now (apart from being a performance and
maintenance nightmare, it also stops any easy improvements to the page
itself).
> That in itself to me is a good reason to keep the new set of priorities. I say
> we can live with using the 'incident reports' as the short list for three
> months. If in 3 months, the set of Critical bug is still too big, we should
> reassess.
Agreed.
Cheers,
Danilo
References