launchpad-dev team mailing list archive
-
launchpad-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06647
Re: Some good feedback on Launchpad
-
To:
Launchpad Community Development Team <launchpad-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Julian Edwards <julian.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:25:56 +0000
-
In-reply-to:
<AANLkTi=_PgBxDc-s=gVaX+f7YeXTU-2Rh=RHbLqcVb+A@mail.gmail.com>
-
Organization:
Canonical Ltd
-
User-agent:
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-27-generic; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; )
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 09:35:08 Jonathan Lange wrote:
> Hello Launchpadders,
>
> There have been a few posts on the 'tubes about Launchpad recently.
> They are well-written posts from thoughtful people:
>
> * http://b.lvh.cc/a-compiled-list-of-launchpads-perceived-flaws
> * http://sheddingbikes.com/posts/1299555462.html
>
> To me, it's very encouraging to get feedback like this, even when I
> disagree with some of the analysis. It reminds me that many of the
> people who don't like Launchpad actually *want* to like it.
The main take-aways I got from reading those two is that:
* Our UI still sucks
* We have a real problem with how people perceive the bzr integration
* Loggerhead needs to be much more tightly integrated into LP
> I would also note that neither of the posts complain about Launchpad's
> speed. One year ago, they would have. We've done very well to change
> that. Maybe next year they'll be talking about how fast they are.
>
> Also, if PPAs rocked any harder, we'd have to display them in a Gothic
> font and stick umlauts over all the vowels:
> http://daniel.holba.ch/blog/?p=901
These two paragraphs have left me with a big grin on my ugly mug.
:D
References