lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-desktop team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02869
Re: Applications by default: Replace xarchiver by file-roller
+1 for file-roller > xarchiver bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xarchiver/+bug/681400
bug in file-roller not present on NFS network share
________________________________
From: Yorvyk <yorvik.ubunto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: lubuntu-desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 9:20:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] Applications by default: Replace xarchiver by
file-roller
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:35:24 +0000
Yorvyk <yorvik.ubunto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 03:43:00 -0800 (PST)
> Stevo Vukovic <stevovukovic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > -1
> > Recently, file-roller has an bug (repeated regression) when extracting
> > multi-part rar from network share (samba, sftp...). Better stick with
>xarchiver
>
> > for some time.
> >
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/639883
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/386795
> >
> >
> >
> At first I thought this problem wasn’t worth worrying about until I realised
>it’s what I normally do. I download files to my server then extract them to the
>machine I intend to use them on. Hopefully the regression will revert during
>Natty’s development
>
>
>
Forgot to add my benchmarks.
Both take around 12-14 MiB but, Xarchiver is a slow CPU hog taking 4½ mins. to
extract an 84 MiB ISO from a BZ2 file using 70% CPU while file-roller took 40
secs. and used 45% CPU. This was teh worst of 3 tests but Xarchiver was quite a
bit slower throughout. Lets hope file-roller gets sorted.
--
Steve Cook (Yorvyk)
http://lubuntu.net
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
Post to : lubuntu-desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-desktop
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Follow ups
References