lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive

[Chris <cyber.druif@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
> Perhaps there is a misunderstanding here. Ubuntu Accessibility does
> not, in fact, set up any roadmap for any distribution except Ubuntu.
> Xubuntu, Kubuntu, Mythbuntu, Edubuntu, etc, all set their own roadmaps
> for the distribution they develope. They do not rely on any other team
> exept their own to decide what they will do in a cycle.
>
> --
> Charlie Kravetz
> Linux Registered User Number 425914          [http://counter.li.org/]
> Never let anyone steal your DREAM.           [http://keepingdreams.com]
>
> No, it means each distribution makes its own accessibility roadmap,
> since we don't know what each distribution developers are capable of
> during a cycle. Kubuntu, for example, will have accessible
> installations and screen-reader this cycle. Xubuntu has not decided on
> its plans yet. Each variant is in fact a separate distribution, even if
> we all use the same repositories.
>
> --
> Charlie Kravetz
> Linux Registered User Number 425914          [http://counter.li.org/]
> Never let anyone steal your DREAM.           [http://keepingdreams.com]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------


What I think is going wrong is difference in jargon.
When the Lubuntu devs/people asked for a roadmap is what the Accessibility
people would see as an priority list. When the Lubuntu people have their
priority list, then they can create their own roadmap. As the Lubuntu devs
are very motivated to get accepted as being an official derivative, they
also want to get to some of the levels Ubuntu has achieved so far at least.
Just to proof their worth. That's why they asked for a "roadmap" and current
position of Ubuntu.

But I think now that the situation has been cleared, I think a priority list
would fill the gap of what the Lubuntu people are looking for. Then they can
argue among themselves what would be a realistic roadmap.

With metta,

Chris Druif