lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-desktop team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05497
Re: Killing glade and gconf -- are there general guidelines or a blueprint?
Am 26.11.2011 11:18, schrieb Julien Lavergne:
> Le 11/26/2011 10:36 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit :
>> On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
>>
>>> No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific
>>> packages are involved.
>>
>> OK, that helps. Is there documentation out there somewhere about what
>> to replace glade with? Examples, tutorials, whatever? Is using glade
>> 3.10.x (and so GTK3) sufficient? Or are we really "killing" glade?
> No, just using GtkBuilder instead of glade should be fine :
> http://developer.gnome.org/gtk/2.24/gtk-migrating-GtkBuilder.html
>
To bring some clearness in here. Glade as the tool to build UIs from
version 2.0 has the capability to use gtkbuilder to build its ui forms.
Also the ubuntu programming infrastructure quickly uses glade (again the
tool) with its default gtkbuilder capabilities.
So as far as I see it we don't have any big problem or are they UIs that
use the glade library instead the gtkbuilder library in Lubuntu ? (Again
glade library does not mean that they were created with glade)
Follow ups
References