lubuntu-desktop team mailing list archive

[Julien Lavergne <julien.lavergne@xxxxxxxxx>]

Le 26 nov. 2011 à 11:49, Leszek Lesner <leszek.lesner@xxxxxx> a écrit :

> Am 26.11.2011 11:18, schrieb Julien Lavergne:
>> Le 11/26/2011 10:36 AM, Jonathan Marsden a écrit :
>>> On 11/26/2011 01:07 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote:
>>> 
>>>> No, the priority is the glade migration because only Lubuntu specific
>>>> packages are involved.
>>> 
>>> OK, that helps.  Is there documentation out there somewhere about what
>>> to replace glade with?  Examples, tutorials, whatever?  Is using glade
>>> 3.10.x (and so GTK3) sufficient?  Or are we really "killing" glade?
>> No, just using GtkBuilder instead of glade should be fine :
>> http://developer.gnome.org/gtk/2.24/gtk-migrating-GtkBuilder.html
>> 
> To bring some clearness in here. Glade as the tool to build UIs from
> version 2.0 has the capability to use gtkbuilder to build its ui forms.
> Also the ubuntu programming infrastructure quickly uses glade (again the
> tool)  with its default gtkbuilder capabilities.
> So as far as I see it we don't have any big problem or are they UIs that
> use the glade library instead the gtkbuilder library in Lubuntu ? (Again
> glade library does not mean that they were created with glade)
> 
The goal is to remove the depends on libglade. I think it's pretty useless to use an external library for something provided by gtk itself (unless the support is not complete enough).

Regards,
Julien Lavergne