lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00280
Re: Lubuntu testing
Hi Adam,
please get yourself registered up on https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa then
I can pass you the thread we are using for each variant of ppc in order
that the very few ppc testers can confirm each others bugs.
I've seen noticed that a couple ppc machines seem to have a still the black
on black on theme, but Raphael needs as much information as possible to
solve this as he does not have access to ppc machine.
I know this may sound daft, but when ever reporting a bug, please do file a
bug report using apport if it is a graphics thing, report it as
lubuntu-artwork, we can always re-assign it later.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport
that link does explain about why it is important to use it. Once done, just
email back the bug number to the lubuntu-qa mailing list & one of us will
check it has arrived correcrtly.
Regards,
Phill.
On 4 March 2012 00:04, o jordan <ojordan12345@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> I've just installed Lubuntu beta tonight. I have to say it is nice to be
> back with something fast after normal Ubuntu!....omg unity gets on my tits,
> but heck nobody else is testing it so I've been doing it.
>
> Anyway, I got your black background problem both on the live CD ubiquity
> and on the installed system (when I get a crash/problem notification). I've
> also been experimenting with Kernel Mode Setting and noticed when I turned
> it on the black background went away. I got a yellow title window
> instead?!! Anyway, I thought I should pass it on - I'll investigate some
> more tomorrow probably. Perhaps nvidia users who use KMS are not seeing
> the black background, but PPC radeon users who use UMS by default are?
>
> KMS is looking a problem for radeon PowerPC users right now. It is an
> ordeal to turn it on and stop it from crashing. There doesn't look like
> there is suspend either.
>
> However, using regular UMS is not much better. Currently it reverts to
> the software rasterizer which I think is why I was finding normal Ubuntu
> dog slow. UMS is being phased out I guess. As you have discovered from
> the messages from UH, suspend also doesn't work out-of-the-box although
> that is easily fixed for UMS. It is documented in the FAQ and I have
> already given the link to the message list. Don't waste your time
> investigating that problem.
>
> Regards
>
> Adam
>
--
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
References
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Phill Whiteside, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: ∅, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Phill Whiteside, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Lars Noodén, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Maps Backward, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Phill Whiteside, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: o jordan, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Maps Backward, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: o jordan, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Maps Backward, 2012-02-16
-
Re: Clean non-pae mini.iso install
From: Phill Whiteside, 2012-02-16