| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Here's the latest. 'make styles' did the trick, thanks. On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Jones <jeff.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We discussed this in the maas-team standup and decided to keep the maas > version and the warning on differing versions. > > .jeff > > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Carla Berkers < > carla.berkers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Yes, it is looking really good! >> >> Agreed we should keep the zone. The following layout in this order >> matches what we agreed (and is consistent with node details): >> >> on the left: >> - Type >> - Last image sync >> - Zone >> - Fabrics >> - DHCP >> >> and on the right: >> - CPU >> - RAM >> - Storage >> - OS >> - MAAS version >> >> The build should match this layout. Jeff there are no updated designs, at >> this point we are editing in code to save time. >> >> I've been thinking about MAAS version. If it is the same as the region >> version it is not useful info for the user - in fact it might be >> unnecessarily confusing. >> If the controller version is different from the region version we should >> display an error. >> So I think we should remove it from the summary and make sure we have an >> error message in place - what do you think Blake? >> >> Thanks, >> Carla >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Blake Rouse <blake.rouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> I think Jeff is correct in keeping the zone. Zone is a physical zone and >>> a rack controller must exists in that physical zone. But overall it is >>> looking really good. >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Richard McCartney < >>> richard.mccartney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey Jeff, >>>> >>>> I’ve pulled down your working branch for MAAS HA, you need to run make >>>> styles as your not using the new updated styles at all and it should fix >>>> the issue with the tree & table styles. Regarding the information summary >>>> this has been finalised in our design catchups and should look like the >>>> following screenshot I have attached. Apart from that everything else so >>>> far looks correct in your working branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> *Richard McCartney* >>>> Front End Web Developer >>>> Cloud & Web Team >>>> >>>> ubuntu.com | canonical.com >>>> >>>> richard.mccartney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> +44 (0) 792 183 4505 >>>> >>>> On 16 Feb 2016, at 03:08, Jeff Jones <jeff.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Rich, >>>> >>>> I've attached a shot of a working first rev of the controller details >>>> page. >>>> This includes all your code from lp:~ricgard/maas/rack-details. >>>> >>>> Questions: >>>> >>>> 1) Some of the summary items in your HTML differ from the node details >>>> page and Carla's mock. (no zone, OS, status on left, DHCP on right, >>>> etc) I've moved them around a bit to make them more consistent with >>>> both. Thoughts? >>>> >>>> 2) Does the tree look right to you? I integrated all your CSS changes, >>>> etc, and that part of the HTML is rote from your branch. You can look >>>> at the HTML in my branch at lp:~trapnine/maas/ha_rack_details - feel >>>> free to submit any HTML changes there. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> P.S. Has the original sketch from Carla been updated? >>>> (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxXAS-9xXKkLZHhWMEJ6OE55NHc/view) >>>> <controller_details.png> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> *Carla Berkers* >> Lead UX Designer >> Cloud & Web Teams >> +44 7926121959 >> > >
Attachment:
controller-details.png
Description: PNG image
| Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
