← Back to team overview

mactel-support team mailing list archive

Re: Januty

 

You can do, and I have seen it done. The method I suggested allows the packages for each to be modified by series. Say something had to be altered in the packaging for Januty but not for Intrepid with the scheme I suggested it could be done with ease and still keep the same upstream version.

If you take a look at my PPA you can see https://launchpad.net/~adamhorden/+archive/ppa what I have done so far. These packages work when I tested them.

So you are suggesting that we have just one package and modify the control files so it can be built for Intrepid and Januty?

Adam

cyberdork33 wrote:
can you not put multiple versions in one of the debian control files so that you have one package that applies multiple releases? I thought I had seen that somewhere. It doesn't make sense to have to keep separate versions for each release.

On Mar 14, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:

adamhorden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,

Henrik I noticed the packages you built for Januty in the PPA.

Why the version bump on the Januty package to the Intrepid package for
applesmc-dkms? I did a diff and I cannot see anything changed other than
the packaging. Is this correct?

Yes - I was simply being lazy, since the old version could not be
uploaded to jaunty without some kind of name change.

[...]
I have the new packages for 0.14.4 for Januty updated locally with the
version appended as above. I was going to add them to the PPA today but
Henrik has all ready updated the packages.

Feel free to upload them - the naming convention you mentioned is
certainly better than the current.

Cheers,
Henrik



_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mactel-support
Post to     : mactel-support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mactel-support
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp





References