Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
on 17-07-10 14:23 Tim Cook wrote: > Hi Roger, > > Thanks for your suggestions. Please feel free to edit the text. It > should be clear to everyone that visits. Since it came from my head. > It means that I do not have the perspective that someone reading it for > the first time will have. > Hi Tim, I only feel free to edit the text wrt my 2nd suggestion and beyond. I honestly don't know the answers to the questions I raised in the first one (I guess that's why I shied away when you started MLHIM last year). > In fact I hope that others will send suggestions as well in order to > make the text easily understandable. The branding is in the graphics. > It doesn't have to be in the text at all. > > One suggestion was made to be that we should define "who we are" not > "who we are not". I think that was a good suggestion as well. Though > it may take more text, it'll be a better description. > > Cheers, > Tim > > > On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 12:04 +0200, Roger Erens wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 18:49, Tim Cook <timothywayne.cook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >> ... >> >>> You can see from the MLHIM umbrella project page >>> https://launchpad.net/mlhim all of the sub-projects. >>> >>> >> Good work! >> >> >>> Thanks for your time. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >> Clicking my way to the mlhim.org home page I have some suggestions for >> the introductory text. >> >> 1) >> In the first paragraph you place multi-level information models >> against commonly used data models. >> Why not just information models against data models? >> If you still choose to contrast multi-level information models against >> data models (which I bet you will), which levels of information >> modelling do we use? >> In short: I miss the definition of Multi-Level Health Information Modelling >> >> 2) >> The fourth paragraph jumps to 'these specifications'. >> Which specifications? What gets specified? >> >> 3) >> The fifth paragraph is one extremely long sentence in which I lose >> trail. (Also note the Launcpad typo). >> >> If you'd use some more (sub-)headings, dots or other styles, the start >> page could really be viewed in Plone's Presentation Mode. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Roger >> >
Attachment:
0xD470F351.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
0xD470F351.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |