mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

[Ian Lawrence <root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Luciana Tricai Cavalini
<lutricav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's funny about it is that that idea goes back to the idea of a
> pure-python implementation that was abandoned in 2008.
> But that's the way things are - sometimes the knowlegde needs some
> cycles to move forward.

Interesting.
I like the idea of a pure python implementation. This way I could use
the library in a Django or Pylons application as easily as I could in
a Zope one. Maybe that is the whole idea of the license change which I
am +1 on

Regards



-- 
http://ianlawrence.info