← Back to team overview

mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

Re: Licenses

 

Hi all,

It is *very* good to know that our latest project decisions help
developers adopting the MLHIM specifications.
Django is soooo popular, having the capability of connecting with such
frameworks is essential (IMO) to make the project more viral and
reaching the right place: the point of care.

Cheers, Luciana.


Em 07/02/2011 09:41, Ian Lawrence escreveu:
> Hi
> 
> On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Luciana Tricai Cavalini
> <lutricav@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What's funny about it is that that idea goes back to the idea of a
>> pure-python implementation that was abandoned in 2008.
>> But that's the way things are - sometimes the knowlegde needs some
>> cycles to move forward.
> 
> Interesting.
> I like the idea of a pure python implementation. This way I could use
> the library in a Django or Pylons application as easily as I could in
> a Zope one. Maybe that is the whole idea of the license change which I
> am +1 on
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
 acredita-se estar livre de perigo.




Follow ups

References