ooc-dev team mailing list archive

[Amos Wenger <amoswenger@xxxxxxxxx>]

These changes sound good, at least simpler and clearer than the previous
process
(especially with the 'drafts' folder and the 'under review' status)

Apologies for having accepted the ORC too early and letting some of you
feel letdown/bypassed. We have a minimum delay of 5 days now,
this ORC is important and we'd of course like to get the input of all
community members & friendlies.

Amos Wenger (nddrylliog)

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Tres Walsh <tres.walsh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I've updated the draft again. A more detailed outline of the
> submission process is present, but it definitely needs some more work
> and cleaning up (which I'll be taking care of tomorrow)
>
>
> http://github.com/sahchandler/middleearth/blob/master/drafts/ORC%20Purpose%20and%20Guidelines.md
>
> I was hoping we could discuss the submission process. In the current
> draft we rely on a folder system, which can work, but I believe a
> branching system would work best. A drafts rejected, and approved
> branch would allow for immediate merging of certain ORC drafts. For
> instance, the current draft would be pulled into the ooc draft branch.
> Upon it's approval a merge with the approved branch would occur. (Or
> rejected). Of course if the Author would like to withdraw the Draft,
> it would only require it's removal from the draft branch, and not the
> entire master branch =)
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Tres Walsh <tres.walsh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I would like to everyone briefly know that we're re-evaluating ORC-1,
> > and putting it back in the drafts section as well as putting it
> > through a more pervasive review process =)
> > Of course any and all changes will be in this thread. And PLEASE don't
> > forget to voice your concerns/feedback!
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Amos Wenger <amoswenger@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >> Ohai folks,
> >>
> >> After an interesting merge party (because the GitHub workers for the
> Fork
> >> Queue are apparently out drinking), I've accepted and pushed our first
> ORC,
> >> by champion Tres Walsh (SAHChandler).
> >> http://is.gd/b7neW
> >>
> >> May this be the first of many interesting ORCs!
> >>
> >> As a reminder, the next few sensitive subjects could very well use an
> ORC:
> >>
> >> Generics (Mostly standardizing the current compilers' behavior)
> >> Testing framework (joshthecoder's proof pretty much fits the bill, I
> think)
> >> Properties (as we've discussed on IRC)
> >> Enums (as specified in this proposal http://is.gd/b7nmQ)
> >>
> >> Enjoy!
> >>
> >> Amos Wenger (nddrylliog)
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Tres Walsh <tres.walsh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A quick change, I changed the file extension to .md so that github
> >>> turns it into pretty HTML :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> http://github.com/sahchandler/middleearth/blob/master/ORC%20Purpose%20and%20Guidelines.md
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Tres Walsh <tres.walsh@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>> > I've rewritten portions of the first ORC. You can check out the new
> >>> > and revised draft here[1]. Again, and all feedback is appreciated.
> >>> > Please be aware of some wording changes. It would be best to reread
> >>> > the whole thing =)
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > [1]
> >>> >
> http://github.com/sahchandler/middleearth/blob/master/ORC%20Purpose%20and%20Guidelines
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> http://treswalsh.com
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ooc-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eooc-dev>
> >>> Post to     : ooc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ooc-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eooc-dev>
> >>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://treswalsh.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://treswalsh.com
>